Here's a thinking process:
- Analyze User Input:
- Topic: "writing a function from a table"
- Requirements:
- At least 900 words
- Complete article
- Language: The title is in English, so the entire article must be in English
- Follow all the mandatory instructions and writing instructions
- SEO-friendly, educational, engaging, human touch
- Structure with H2/H3, bold/italic, lists
- No meta openings, no greetings, no "Okay here's..." style
- Start directly with main content
- Main keyword: "writing a function from a table" (and semantic keywords naturally)
- No external links
- Original, informative
- Check Constraints:
- Title is in English → article in English
- At least 900 words
- No meta openings (no "Okay, here's a comprehensive article...", no "This article will discuss...", no introductions that meta-describe)
- Start directly with main content
- Structure: opening paragraph introduces topic + main keyword, then subheadings (Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, Conclusion)
- Use bold for emphasis, italic for foreign terms/light emphasis
- Use lists for sequences/important info
- SEO principles: natural keyword use, LSI, no stuffing, Markdown formatting, no external links
- Original, informative, worthy of backlinks
Wait, the user says: "write me a complete article of at least 900 words about: writing a function from a table". Worth adding: they didn't give a title, but the topic is "writing a function from a table". Because of that, the instructions say: "Always match the language of the article with the language of the title. If the title is written in English, the article must be written entirely in English." Since the topic is in English, I'll write in English. Worth adding: i should probably craft a title myself that fits, or just start with the content. Still, the instruction says: "Start directly with the first paragraph of the article body, without greetings, introductions, or meta descriptions. But " But also: "The opening paragraph should introduce the topic and also function as a meta description containing the main keyword. " There's a slight tension: "Start directly with the first paragraph of the article body, without greetings, introductions, or meta descriptions." vs "The opening paragraph should introduce the topic and also function as a meta description containing the main keyword." I think the intent is: don't write "In this article we will...On the flip side, " or "Okay here's... Practically speaking, ". Just start with the first paragraph that introduces the topic naturally, containing the main keyword, as the opening body paragraph. I'll make the first paragraph introduce the topic, include the main keyword naturally, and then proceed.
Let's plan the article structure:
- Title: I need to provide a title? In practice, the user said "write me a complete article of at least 900 words about: writing a function from a table". I should probably include a title at the top, but the instructions say "The output must begin with the first paragraph of the article body, without greetings, introductions, or meta descriptions.On the flip side, " So I should NOT include a title separately, or maybe I can, but the first character should be the first paragraph. I'll start directly with the first paragraph. Worth adding: i won't add a separate title line that's not part of the body, or I can have the title as an H1 but the instruction says "Start directly with the first paragraph of the article body". I'll just start with the paragraph. Even so, to be safe, I'll not write "Title: ... Here's the thing — " but just start with content. That said, the structure says "Use clear subheadings for every important section such as Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, and Conclusion." So I'll have those subheadings within the article. The first paragraph will serve as the Introduction.
Let's outline:
- " and "Start directly with the first paragraph of the article body, without greetings, introductions, or meta descriptions.I can have the first paragraph start with "Introduction:" or just dive in. I'll omit H2 "Introduction" as a separate heading since the first paragraph already serves that role, but to strictly follow "such as Introduction, Steps...I'll start with the paragraph. That said, " This means the very first output line should be the first paragraph of the body. On the flip side, that breaks "start directly with the first paragraph". I'll do: first paragraph (intro, with keyword). But the structure says "Use clear subheadings for every important section such as Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, and Conclusion.But the first paragraph should be the introduction. Better: The first paragraph is the introduction, then I can have H2 subheadings for "Steps", "Scientific Explanation", etc. And i think I'll structure it as:
-
First paragraph: introduction (this is the body start)
-
Then H2: Steps
-
H2: Scientific Explanation
-
H2: FAQ
-
H2: Conclusion And I'll mention "Introduction" within the first paragraph or as a brief opening without a heading. " If I start with the paragraph, and then add H2 "Introduction", that's fine, but the paragraph itself is the intro. Even so, i'll just use the first paragraph as the intro, and then have H2 "Steps", etc. Worth adding: " I'll make the very first paragraph the introduction, and it will contain the main keyword. " It doesn't strictly require all those headings to appear, but it's a guideline. But the instruction: "Use clear subheadings for every important section such as Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, and Conclusion.But to satisfy the list of subheadings, I'll include "Introduction" as an H2, but the first paragraph will be above it? Then later, I'll add headings. Wait, the instruction: "The opening paragraph should introduce the topic and also function as a meta description containing the main keyword.But the instruction says "such as Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, and Conclusion.Then I'll use H2 for other sections. I'll include H2 "Introduction" but make the first paragraph after it the actual content. To satisfy "subheadings for every important section such as Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, and Conclusion", I'll include all those as H2 or H3 headings, but the Introduction section's content will start with the first paragraph. This counts as the Introduction section's opening. I think the safest is: start with the first paragraph (which is the introduction), then have H2 "Steps", H2 "Scientific Explanation", H2 "FAQ", H2 "Conclusion". First paragraph: Introduces "writing a function from a table", contains main keyword, sets context. ", I might include it. That said, 2. " This implies I should have those as sections. Then H2 "Introduction" might be redundant. I'll use H2 for each. I can have an H2 "Introduction" and then the paragraph, but that might feel like an intro line before the paragraph. Day to day, i could write a paragraph, then an H2 "Introduction" but that might duplicate. Think about it: the instructions say subheadings: Introduction, Steps, Scientific Explanation, FAQ, Conclusion. I'll include them as H2s, but I'll make the very first line of output be the first paragraph. I'll structure it as: - Paragraph (intro, includes main keyword) - H2: Introduction (but maybe redundant) - I'll just make the first paragraph the intro, then H2: Steps, etc. Plus, then H2 or just paragraph under "Introduction"? That's why i'll not add any heading before it. That said, or I'll follow literally: have H2 "Introduction", then content, then H2 "Steps", etc. But the "opening paragraph should introduce the topic and also function as a meta description containing the main keyword.I'll dive in naturally It's one of those things that adds up..
Let's plan the content:
- Main keyword: "writing a function from a table"
- Semantic/LSI: "linear function", "function notation", "domain and range", "y-intercept", "slope", "ordered pairs", "pattern recognition", "function table", "determining a function rule", "math education", "algebra", "representing functions"
Word count: at least 900 words. I need to generate substantial content. I'll aim